© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A man passes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York in New York City, U.S., March 13, 2023. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid/File Photo
NXGN
0.00%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position
Position added successfully to:
Please name your holdings portfolio
Type:
BUY
SELL
Date:
Amount:
Price
Point Value:
Leverage:
1:1
1:10
1:25
1:50
1:100
1:200
1:400
1:500
1:1000
Commission:
Create New Watchlist
Create
Create a new holdings portfolio
Add
Create
+ Add another position
Close
By Michael S. Derby
NEW YORK (Reuters) – The Federal Reserve Bank of New York said on Friday it accepted $1.018 trillion at its overnight reverse repo facility, as inflows to the central bank liquidity facility surged on the final trading day of the year.
Friday’s inflows were expected to jump and were well above the $829.6 billion seen on Thursday. Friday’s inflows were the first time above $1 trillion since Nov. 13.
The Fed’s reverse repo facility exists to put a floor underneath short-term interest rates and is a key tool in the Fed’s efforts to influence the economy to achieve its employment and inflation mandates. The facility has seen big inflows over recent years amid strong Fed stimulus work and peaked at a record $2.6 trillion on Dec. 30, 2022.
The facility has been shrinking markedly in recent weeks as the Fed continues to draw down liquidity and other money market securities prove more attractive to investors relative to the 5.30% rate offered on reverse repos.
Money markets are often unsettled in the final days of any year and it’s become a normal pattern for the firms eligible to use the reverse repo facility to do so more aggressively. Some analysts expected ahead of Friday for any surge into reverse repo to quickly dissipate: Forecasters at Wrightson ICAP (LON:NXGN) are eyeing about a $400 billion decline in reserve repo inflows over the next week or so.
The New York Fed also reported Friday that there were zero inflows into its Standing Repo Facility, which suggests any dislocations or liquidity needs in money markets were not substantial.
Source: Investing.com