No concessions from China as Trump postpones some tariffs: U.S. officials

0
7
© Reuters. U.S. Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross speaks during a 17th Latin American Leadership Forum in Brasilia© Reuters. U.S. Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross speaks during a 17th Latin American Leadership Forum in Brasilia

By Susan Heavey and David Lawder

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – China made no concessions to the after President Donald Trump postponed threatened tariffs on some Chinese imports until mid-December, senior U.S. officials said on Wednesday, adding that talks aimed at resolving the trade fight would continue and markets should be patient.

“This was not a quid pro quo,” U.S. Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross told CNBC television in an interview, using a Latin phrase meaning a favor exchanged for a favor.

Trump on Tuesday backed off his Sept. 1 deadline for imposing 10% tariffs on thousands of Chinese imports, including technology products, clothing and footwear, pushing it to Dec. 15 for certain items. U.S. and Chinese officials also announced renewed trade discussions.

Article continues below Advertisement...

Both developments drew cautious relief from retailers and technology groups as the world’s two largest economies enter the second year of their trade dispute.

Trump’s tariff delay comes amid growing concerns about a slowdown. U.S. stocks fell sharply on Wednesday as bond markets issued a possible recession signal with the U.S. Treasury yield curve inverting for the first time since 2007. [.N][US/]

White House trade adviser Peter Navarro, in a separate interview on Fox Business Network, said the decision to delay the additional tariffs was made to limit the pain on U.S. businesses, which already had contracts to buy Chinese goods for the holiday selling season and had no way to avoid passing costs on to consumers.

Trump on Tuesday said he delayed the tariffs to shield Christmas sales from the tariffs.

Looking for concessions from China in exchange for the delayed tariffs is the “totally wrong way to look at it,” Navarro said.

“The whole premise of what we’re trying to do is pain on them, not pain on us,” Navarro said. “And so … if we simply put the tariffs on Sept. 1 that would be more pain on us, rather than pain on them. That’s just silly.”

Navarro declined to say what U.S. negotiators would seek to achieve in the talks with Chinese officials before the tariffs take effect. Another phone call is scheduled between the two sides later this month.

“These negotiations will happen behind closed doors,” Navarro said. “People just need to be patient.”

Ross said on CNBC that it was too early to assess where U.S.-China trade talks stand, adding that a date has not been set for another round of face-to-face discussions.

“Until something is really formally announced and mutually agreed, it’s a little premature to say where anybody is,” Ross said.

China’s economy stumbled more sharply than expected in , with industrial output growth cooling to a more than 17-year low, according to data released on Wednesday, as the intensifying U.S. trade dispute took a heavier toll on businesses and consumers.

Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the , it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.

Source: Investing.com