24.5 C
New York
Saturday, August 13, 2022

Fed’s Kaplan sees 2019 as decision time on rate hike path

Fed's Kaplan sees 2019 as decision time on rate hike path© Reuters. Dallas Federal Reserve Bank President Kaplan stands on a stage in Stanford

By Ann Saphir and Lindsay Dunsmuir

DALLAS/WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The Federal Reserve should keep raising U.S. interest rates until mid-2019, and only then needs to take a decision on when it ought to stop, Dallas Fed President Robert Kaplan suggested on Friday.

Kaplan has previously said he thinks the Fed should raise rates three or four more times over the next nine to 12 months to lift interest rates to the 2.5 percent to 2.75 percent range he views as neutral, a view he reiterated on Friday at a conference at his bank’s headquarters.

Asked if rates should go beyond that level, as fellow policymaker Chicago Fed President Charles Evans suggested earlier this week, Kaplan said it’s too early to say.

“That’s a judgment that I’m not prepared to make yet and I don’t have to make yet, because it won’t be until middle spring to middle of next year before we are approaching a level that I think is in the range of neutral, and I will all along the way be revising my views for what is the outlook for the economy,” he told reporters.

The debate over how far to raise rates is paramount at the Fed under Chairman Jerome Powell, who has so far overseen two rate hikes this year and is expected to raise rates two more times before the year is out. In a recent speech Powell suggested he was wary of relying too much on estimates of the neutral rate to guide policy.

Kaplan on Friday pushed back on jettisoning the concept.

“If you know that the neutral rate is subject to revision and is a theoretical concept, you want to move gradually,” he said. But the Fed still needs to estimate the neutral rate to judge whether policy is accommodative, neutral or restrictive, he said, adding that he’s skeptical that the neutral rate is rising.

Moreover, the stimulus delivered by tax cuts and increased government spending under the Trump administration will likely fade next year and in 2020, a fact that Kaplan said gives him pause as he contemplates rate hikes beyond the middle of next year.

One factor he’ll be watching, he said, is whether short-term borrowing costs rise above longer-term ones, a phenomenon known as a yield curve inversion that has foreshadowed every recession in recent memory.


Kaplan also said he is keeping a close eye on the tariff spat between President Donald Trump and U.S. trade partners.

“If we stop right now …in terms of the overall U.S. economy the impact has been modest,” he said, adding that he believes the United States will resolve its trade differences within North America and with Europe in the near term.

With China, he said, the process could take more time. And even though battling with China on trade issues is “the right fight” to pick because of ongoing disputes over technology transfers and use of intellectual property, it would not be surprising if it takes months or even years to resolve.

“If it widens out though to more goods or goes on longer, we’ll (Fed policymakers) obviously reserve the right to revisit that and we will revisit it,” Kaplan said.

Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.

Source: Investing.com

Related Articles

Stay Connected

- Advertisement -

Latest Articles

Popular Articles