© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: People look out from Greenwich Park, with Canary Wharf in the distance, in London, Britain June 22, 2023. REUTERS/Hannah McKay/File Photo
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Position added successfully to:
Please name your holdings portfolio
Create New Watchlist
Create a new holdings portfolio
+ Add another position
By Sinead Cruise, Lucy Raitano and Lewis Jackson
LONDON/SYDNEY (Reuters) – Commercial real estate investors and lenders are slowly confronting an ugly question – if people never again shop in malls or work in offices the way they did before the pandemic, how safe are the fortunes they piled into bricks and mortar?
Rising interest rates, stubborn inflation and squally economic conditions are familiar foes to seasoned commercial property buyers, who typically ride out storms waiting for rental demand to rally and the cost of borrowing to fall.
Cyclical downturns rarely prompt fire sales, so long as lenders are confident the investor can repay their loan and the value of the asset remains above the debt lent against it.
This time though, analysts, academics and investors interviewed by Reuters warn things could be different.
With remote working now routine for many office-based firms and consumers habitually shopping online, cities like London, Los Angeles and New York are bloated with buildings local populations no longer want or need.
That means values of city-centre skyscrapers and sprawling malls may take much longer to rebound. And if tenants can’t be found, landlords and lenders risk losses more painful than in previous cycles.
“Employers are beginning to appreciate that building giant facilities to warehouse their people is no longer necessary,” Richard Murphy, political economist and professor of accounting practice at the UK’s Sheffield University, told Reuters.
“Commercial landlords should be worried. Investors in them would be wise to quit now,” he added.
WALL OF DEBT
Global banks hold about half of the $6 trillion outstanding commercial real estate debt, Moody’s (NYSE:MCO) Investors Service said in June, with the largest share maturing in 2023-2026.
U.S. banks revealed spiralling losses from property in their first half figures and warned of more to come.
Global lenders to U.S. industrial and office real estate investment trusts (REITs), who supplied credit risk assessments to data provider Credit Benchmark in July, said firms in the sector were now 17.9% more likely to default on debt than they estimated six months ago. Borrowers in the UK real estate holding & development category were 4% more likely to default.
Jeffrey Sherman, deputy chief investment officer at $92 billion U.S. investment house DoubleLine, said some U.S. banks were wary of tying up precious liquidity in commercial property refinancings due in the next two years.
“Deposit flight can happen any day,” he said, pointing to the migration of customer deposits from banks to higher-yielding ‘risk-free’ money market funds and Treasury bonds.
“As long as the Fed keeps rates high, it’s a ticking time bomb,” he said.
Some global policymakers, however, remain confident that the post-pandemic shift in the notion of what it means ‘to go to work’ will not herald a 2008-9 style credit crisis.
Demand for loans from euro zone companies tumbled to the lowest on record last quarter, while annual U.S. Federal Reserve ‘stress tests’ found banks on average would suffer a lower projected loan loss rate in 2023 than 2022 under an ‘extreme’ scenario of a 40% drop in commercial real estate values.
Average UK commercial property values have already fallen by around 20% from their peak without triggering major loan impairments, with one senior regulatory source noting that UK banks have far smaller property exposure as a proportion of overall lending than 15 years ago.
But Charles-Henry Monchau, Chief Investment Officer at Bank Syz likened the impact of aggressive rate tightening to dynamite fishing.
“Usually the small fishes come to the surface first, then the big ones – the whales – come last,” he said.
“Was Credit Suisse the whale? Was SVB the whale? We’ll only know afterwards. But the whale could be commercial real estate in the U.S.”.
Global property services firm Jones Lang LaSalle – which in May pointed to a 18% annual drop in first quarter global leasing volumes – published data this month showing prime office rental growth in New York, Beijing, San Francisco, Tokyo and Washington D.C. turned negative over the same period.
In Shanghai, China’s leading financial hub, office vacancy rates rose 1.2 percentage points year-on-year in Q2 to 16%, rival Savills said, suggesting a recovery would depend on nationwide stimulus policies succeeding.
Businesses are also under pressure to slash their carbon footprint, with HSBC among those cutting the amount of space they rent and terminating leases at offices no longer considered ‘green’ enough.
More than 1 billion square meters of office space globally will need to be retrofitted by 2050, with a tripling of current rates to at least 3%-3.5% of stock annually to meet net-zero targets, JLL said.
Australia’s largest pension fund, the A$300 billion AustralianSuper, is among those on the sidelines, saying in May it would suspend new investment in unlisted office and retail assets due to poor returns.
Meanwhile, short-sellers continue to circle listed property landlords the world over, betting that their stock prices will sink.
The volume of real estate stocks lent by institutional investors to support shorting activity has grown by 30% in EMEA and 93% in North America over the 15 months to July, according to data provider Hazeltree.
According to Capital Economics, global property returns of around 4% a year are forecast this decade, compared with a pre-pandemic average of 8%, with only a slight improvement expected in the 2030s.
“Investors must be willing to accept a lower property risk premium,” Capital Economics said. “Property will look overvalued by the standards of the past.”